Testimony - Newborn Screening

Maternal and Child Health Bureau
Health Resources and Services Administration
5600 Fishers Lane
Parklawn Building, 18A-19
Rockville, MD 20857

3/11/05

To Whom It May Concern:

    We are writing in response to the request from HRSA regarding public comments concerning newborn screening.  Family Voices is a national network on behalf of children with special healthcare needs and our NJ Chapter is housed at the Statewide Parent Advocacy Network, NJ’s federally funded Parent Training and Information Center.  In addition, SPAN is the Family-to-Family Health Information Center for the state.  We strongly support the concept of a uniform condition panel for newborn screening programs.  Discrepancies in availability of testing exist not only between difference states but even within states as found in our NJ Newborn Screening Advisory Panel.  The panel requested that the following conditions be added to NJ screenings:  Biotinidase deficiency; Congenital adrenal hyperplasia; Fatty acid oxidation disorders; Maple syrup urine disease; Citrullinemia and arginosuccinic academia; and Cystic fibrosis.  In addition, the panel recommended the following disorders be included in ongoing review for consideration of future inclusion:  LCHAD, organic acidemias, tyrosinemia, homocystinemia and arginase deficiency.  Our state panel did not recommend the addition of G-6PD Deficiency or Toxoplasmosis.  A complete copy of the report including decision rationale for inclusion, future consideration, or exclusion of specific tests can be found at http://www.state.nj.us/health/fhs/nbs2000/report.htm.  The NJ panel found that “tandem mass spectrometry and DNA-based tests offer the possibility of screening for additional disorders” more easily than in the past.  The screening needs to be equally accessible to all families regardless of geographic location.  The American Academy of Pediatrics Newborn Screening Task Force urged national uniformity in newborn screening.  Other national reports (National Academy of Science, Institute of Medicine Report, and the Task Force on Genetic Testing) documented the need for quality control, evaluation of effectiveness, and improving outcomes which support the findings and recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) report.  There should be minimum state standards developed using model programs as examples along with national oversight.  Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the continuing development of newborn screening.    

Sincerely,

Lauren Agoratus-parent

NJ Coordinator

Family Voices at the Statewide Parent Advocacy Network

35 Halsey St., 4th Fl.

Newark, N.J. 07102

(800) 654-SPAN ext. 110

email familyvoices@spannj.org

website www.spannj.org

BACK