IDEA's Proactive Requirements to Prevent & Address Challenging Behavior
IDEA
emphasizes the need of State and local educational agencies to work to ensure
that superintendents, principals, teachers and other school personnel are
equipped with the knowledge and skills that will enable them to appropriately
address behavior problems when they occur. In fact, research has shown that if
teachers and other school personnel have the knowledge and expertise to provide
appropriate behavioral interventions, future behavior problems can be greatly
diminished if not totally avoided. The fact that school-based discipline
problems frequently interfere with teaching and learning suggest that much more
staff development may be needed.
IDEA
also includes provisions that focus on individual children.
If a child has behavior problems that interfere with his or her learning
or the learning of others, the IEP team must consider whether strategies,
including positive behavioral interventions, strategies, and supports
are needed
to address the behavior. If the IEP
team determines that such services are needed, they must be added to the IEP and
must be provided.
In
fact, previous hearings and court cases suggest that problem behaviors requiring
IEP services may include:
a. Disruptive behaviors that distract teachers from teaching and students from learning
b. Noncompliance
c.
Verbal and physical abuse,
d.
Property destruction
e. Aggression towards students or staff
Best practices would suggest that these behavioral intervention plans should be based on a “functional behavioral assessment.” Consequently, when a student's behavior interferes with his/her learning, initial evaluations and reevaluations, as well as subsequent reports should describe that behavior, how it interferes with learning, possible causes of the behavior and recommendations to address the behavior.
In
fact, IDEA mandates that special education evaluations include a functional
assessment of behavior where appropriate. In addition, the special education
code mandates that evaluation reports include relevant behavior (observed
&/or reported) and the relationship of that behavior to the student's
academic functioning.
Consequently,
legal mandates and best practices would suggest that individual evaluations
should assess the causes and strengths of inappropriate behaviors and recommend
interventions to decrease inappropriate behaviors. In this way, subsequent IEPs,
positive
PREVENTING AND ADDRESSING CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR
Revised on October 15, 2005